Discontinuing cessationism: The Scriptures (Prologue)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f4d5/0f4d55bd6e23de3992004715567068646d6a9a35" alt=""
Just a little pre-dive cleanup duty: Coramdeo (CD) asked some questions in the comments of a previous post that deserve clarification here on the 'main page'.
In that posting, I made note that I attend a "functionally cessationist church". CD fairly asked, "Since I've used the expression "functional cessationist" too, why don't you also define what you think it means?" Why I'd be happy to!
In speaking of my own church, I was simply trying to be descriptive (rather than applying some technical definition). Our church's doctrinal statement makes no specific mention of our position on the ongoing operation of the sign gifts of the Holy Spirit. However, if you walk in our church on a Sunday you will not see the gifts functioning in our corporate worship. So, I was calling our church 'functionally cessationist' because we simply function as a cessationist church whether or not that is specifically a point of doctrine for us. Just to be fair, I expect that our church's elders likely would land in the cessationist camp if the issue was brought up and tackled.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1993/d1993823f15f14a39ad5cc1641ec3c59e5529345" alt=""
The other clean-up item: CD said, "I do think this issue, like others, may not be simply binary. I find myself ... often holding the "excluded middle" in many matters. If my uncertainty on this matter were a matter of sloth or weakness of leadership, shame on me. But can I hold a prinicpled middle-ground? perhaps..."
I surely hope that there's a "principled middle-gound" to be held, since that seems to be where I'm going to land... Ok, perhaps I'll be a little off-center. My point originally was not to imply that this is a binary, 'either/or' kinda issue. I certainly think that we're discussing something of a continuum of views, any one gradation of which may be correct. I'm not challenging the adoption of a 'moderate' position, but rather the adoption of such a position without choosing to study the Word and let it inform our opinion.
As believers, we must stand somewhere. We must wrestle with the text and come to a conclusion about what we believe and why. The 'middle' is fine if that position can be validated scripturally.
Many people exhibit a tendency with issues like this to just say, "Yeah that's a toughie!" and avoid the topic altogether. In doing so, they really choose to land nowhere rather than left, right, or center.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/375ac/375ac304ffd765e40399392e71e2e96d5b71bae5" alt=""
Now, that's 'Sola Scriptura'.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8355/f8355256d5a67215dd7401700b6afc473941d8ca" alt=""
- The first post on 1 Corinthians 12:1-26 will drop sometime Friday or Saturday.
- I'll try to follow that up by covering 12:27 through 13:7 by Tuesday.
- Next Wed, Thur, or Fri will bring a post picking through the rest of chapter 13 and part of 14 (13:8 on down to 14:19).
- The final post on 14:20-40 will be thrown out sometime next weekend.
Those of you who know me know that I'm a stickler for context... Taking verses, or even sections of verses, in isolation can introduce problems. With that in mind, I'd humbly ask that those of you reading along with these posts would take the time to read the entire section of 1 Corinthians that's 'in play' at least a couple times. Get the feeling for the whole message before we break it up into tasty, bite-sized nuggets. Click Here to give it a read.
And keep praying... Above all else, pray.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home